Mumbai road rage: 6-month jail for middle finger, swearing | Mumbai News

MUMBAI: Convicting and sentencing a 31-year-old Worli guy to 6 months imprisonment for sexually harassing a 66-year-old lady via appearing the center finger and screaming “f**ok your self bloody b***h” to her and her son in a road rage incident at Hughes Highway in 2018, a Justice of the Peace’s courtroom has stated that during the crime, the girl’s basic proper to are living with dignity used to be attacked.
“Each and every lady in a society has the suitable to are living with dignity. In a criminal offense which is said to the modesty of girls, it’s an assault on their basic rights to are living with dignity,” Girgaum metropolitan Justice of the Peace Nadeem A Patel stated.

TimesView

It’s simple that the person behaved boorishly and deserved to be penalized. Alternatively, he will have been reprimanded in different ways corresponding to being requested to do neighborhood provider, pay a financial high-quality or have his driving force’s license suspended. Sending him to prison for 6 months turns out over the top.

The courtroom refused to let the accused, Aniket Patil, off on a bond of excellent behaviour. The Justice of the Peace stated that he used to be grown up sufficient to grasp the results of his movements.
“In this sort of case, if unwarranted leniency is proven to the accused, it is going to ship the mistaken sign to society,” the courtroom stated.
Highway rage: Any lady can also be sufferer of molestation two times, says Justice of the Peace
Subsequently, the accused must no longer be launched on a just right behaviour bond or on high-quality,” the courtroom stated. Patil used to be additionally fined Rs 1,000. The utmost sentence attracted within the case used to be one-year prison. A number of the 4 witnesses cited via public prosecutor B U Gavali have been the girl and her son.
Refuting the defence argument that the girl had prior to now filed a sexual harassment case in opposition to every other accused, the courtroom stated, “Submitting of 1 prior FIR associated with sexual harassment does no longer imply that the girl is in a addiction of submitting such FIRs to extract the cash. Any lady can also be the sufferer of molestation two times. It’s unhappy and unlucky however true that she is the sufferer of molestation two times via two other individuals.”
Within the 18-page judgment replica, the courtroom additionally defined why appearing the center finger to a girl is a vulgar gesture that quantities to insulting her modesty — at the start the logo intended to threaten any individual with sexual violence.
The lady instructed the courtroom that on September 17, 2018, her son and he or she have been going to their place of work via automobile. Round 11.40am, after they reached Cadbury Junction, a pink automobile all of sudden got here from the left aspect and driven them against the divider. The lady stated this persevered for roughly 100m distance. Thereafter, after they went directly to Hughes Highway, they spotted {that a} automobile used to be looking to overtake them. Moments later they stopped on the sign. The lady stated that the pink automobile stopped on their left aspect and the motive force rolled down the window and confirmed them the center finger. The lady instructed her son to “care for peace”, however the accused abused her. He then attempted to force away, however her son blocked him together with his automobile. In the meantime, a visitors cop reached the spot and Patil used to be taken to Gamdevi police station.
The defence claimed that although it used to be the girl’s son who abused Patil, he had used his affect as a legal professional to check in a false FIR. Refuting this, the courtroom stated that an suggest may also be a sufferer of the crime. “Even no girl of 66 years will put her personality at stake to report false FIR on petty problems. It is usually no longer a case appropriate to prudent guy…to make use of his mom to report false FIR of sexual harassment on highway rage,” the courtroom stated.